Left Behind pegged as **Violence!** December 14, 2006Posted by joshg in Christianity, mainstream games, morality & ethics, violence.
An article from USA Today sums up some of the controversy in Christian circles over Left Behind: Eternal Forces.
It’s hard to pick a quote when there’s so much verbal sniping going both ways, but my favorite has to be this one from The Tim LaHaye himself:
“These groups don’t attack other violent video games. Their real attack is on our theology,” says Tim LaHaye, co-author of the novels, who endorsed the game.
I think this is a case of him saying something true that implies something completely untrue. Give me a second and I’ll try to make that statement make sense.
Do these groups attack other violent video games? Well, let’s just assume that they don’t for now, although that’s probably not true of all the groups involved. Is their real attack on the Left Behind theology? Okay, sure. But does that mean that their real objection isn’t to the violence? Nay, says I. The issues of violence and theology aren’t independant here – the way that violence is used as part of gameplay is a theological message.
LeHaye has a good reason to try and deflect the notion that the objection to this game stems from the general issue of “Violent Video Games”. For some, it probably does, but the reason that Christian groups are placing this game higher on their moral agendas than, say, Dawn of War certainly isn’t because Left Behind is more violent. But the fact that this is an attack on theology certainly doesn’t mean that it can be brushed aside, thinking, “Oh, that’s one of those academic theological differences that Christians don’t agree on, anyway.”
The theological topic is incredibly relevant: when does our faith justify violence?
Don’t try and tell me that issue is purely academic in our world today. I’ll laugh.